The father of the Middle Way Philosophy, Nagarjuna, analyzed reality from a four-point analysis (a tetra lemma ) which ultimately suggested things are not as they seem—nor are they otherwise. Also, in his much debated Second Chapter of the Mulamadhyamakakarika, which refutes motion, he states, in karika eighteen: “That motion just is the mover itself/ Is not correct./ Nor is it correct that/ They are completely different.” Chandrakirti in his grammatical analysis of Nagarjuna’s refutation of motion, posited an equally challenging, illustrative conundrum concerning a ‘motionless’ mover as being on “a road that is being traveled on, that is being traveled on,” which linguistically ‘moves’ motion to a nonphysical plane. Nagarjuna’s refutation of motion concludes with: “Neither an entity nor a non-entity/ Moves in any of the three ways./ So motion, mover/ And route are non-existent.” If that’s not enough of the rug being pulled out from under an ingrained sense of there ha...